🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to lower costs immediately upon taking office. However, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued voters delivered a rebuke at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a hastily assembled campaign to address affordability. Unfortunately, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, unrealistic expectations, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Out-of-Touch Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Merely 48 hours after the election, the president began his cost-reduction push with a poorly received statement: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—often mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their concerns as unimportant, suggesting they were mistaken about price levels.

His assertion that everything was “way down” proved absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Official statistics show the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and coffee prices jumped 18.9%—in part because of punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in five of the six food categories tracked by the government’s price index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Statements

In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his misleading narrative about lower costs. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “prices are way down,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the fact that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump boasted that fuel costs had dropped to around two dollars, despite official data show they average $3.19.

Confronted by reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. A lot of voters are frustrated about rising costs after assurances of reductions. In response, aides proposed a simple solution: roll back certain import taxes. This sensible idea clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As some tariffs reduced on several food items, the administration will probably announce that he has cut prices once these products start declining in price. That would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—especially when many risk losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think economic conditions are fair or poor, while just a quarter consider them positive. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens feel Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Truth and Proposed Steps

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, recently contradicted assertions of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, the president suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—concerned about huge budget deficits—will approve such a plan. This idea could increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another proposed solution for affordability involved creating half-century home loans, based on the idea that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to reduce installments—often cutting them by just $100 or $200 each month. The downside is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have again blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and untruthful allegations. In reality, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. However, Trump’s policies—especially import taxes—have created an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at a research firm, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. Zandi worries that if key regions like California and New York enter a downturn, the US could face a widespread recession. During recessions, people generally possess less money to spend, and price increases usually declines. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.